5. Heavenly Creatures
Peter
Jackson’s use of Orson Welles as intertext in his creepy, psychosexual
deconstruction-of-fantasy, Heavenly
Creatures, helps to map out the socio-ideological framing of the two
real-life girls on which the film is based. Centering on Pauline Parker (the
marginalized Melanie Lynskey) and Juliet Hulme (a pre-Titanic Kate Winslet), the allusion to Welles, by including clips
of him as Harry Lime in The Third Man,
further articulates the danger of the girls’ obsessive-cum-desperate
personalities that are becoming more and more evident by the time the two
would-be ingénues sit in on a repertory showing of Carol Reed’s classic film
noir.
The perfect symbol of their badness, Lime is an American expatriate, as angry
and isolated by the acculturation of his native land as the girls are by their
parents.
Jackson’s use of dialogism is Wellesian in itself, as Welles constantly played
with the idea of putting multiple discourses into dialogue with each other.
Pauline and Juliet dialogue, not just with Welles but also, with most-things
simultaneously insurgent and expressive (the rich operas of Mario Lanza, waking
dreams, invocation of spirits, ideas of freedom in a repressive milieu).
With Heavenly Creatures, Jackson took
the lewd style of his earlier works Bad Taste
and Meet the Feebles, combined it
with the stark horror of his Dead Alive and
a pastiche of deep-focus, long-take, roving camera-style cinema, and came away
with the essence for what would become the CGI-abused style of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy -- which broke him out of marginalization and put him in
the mainstream. LOTR, in terms of
recognition, is everything Heavenly
Creatures should have become (though I’m not suggesting it can match its
epic elements).
Upon its release, Heavenly Creatures received
rave reviews, was awarded the Silver Lion at the Venice Film Festival, and
subsequently won an Academy Award nomination for Best Screenplay. The film
continues to gain critical esteem.
Opening on only two screens and perhaps due to the lack of Americans’ desire to
see a film about two silver-spoon girls conspiring to kill the mother of one
who was trying to keep them apart, Heavenly
Creatures amassed a dismal opening-weekend gross of slightly more than
$30,000.
1994, the film’s year of release -- post-Cold War; post-U.S.-economic recession
-- was dominated by comedies (Dumb and
Dumber, The Mask, Naked Gun 33 1/3), films of history as
self-help reassurance (Forrest Gump),
family films (Lion King, The Santa Clause, The Flintstones) and action films (True Lies). But edgier material sold as well (Pulp Fiction, Interview with
a Vampire, Natural Born Killers),
making the scant public appeal for Heavenly
Creatures a curious one.
Whatever the pathology, Heavenly
Creatures is a treasure waiting to be mined for cinephiles and casual
moviegoers, alike. With certain escapist elements -- its musical composition,
mesmerizing cinematography and the star iconography of Winslet – this is a
movie for all audiences. It’s one of the true hybrids of intellectual and fun
cinema. One need only consider the film’s title, Heavenly Creatures, to presuppose the wry duality of which I speak.
(Jon Lap)