Online Film Critics Society
Home     About OFCS     Member Profiles     Schedule     Forum     Awards     OFCS Blog
    O.F.C.S. Members: Sign In    

Other Info
Sources
• Apollo Guide
• Oscar Guy
Total Reviews: 574
Wesley Lovell
Wesley Lovell
Wesley Lovell

Article type:      Default Sorting (most recent)
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 574  Next
Sort by
RATING
    
Sort by
TITLE/YEAR
    
Sort by
QUOTE
    
Sort by
SOURCE
  
  
71/100
     (2000)      "As insightful as teen romances come, 100 Girls is an examination of one guy’s search for the perfect girl." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
36/100
     (2000)      "3 Strikes put its team to bat and struck out without a hit." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
52/100
     (1994)      "When you play with something this formulaic, you’re bound to trip upon a theme that has been endlessly explored and agonizingly overdone." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
52/100
     (1994)      "There’s not a whole lot to this DVD release." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
35/100
     (1997)      "A pedestrian action movie that rolls out every cliché in the book and is dragged down by a humorless plot and weak performances." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
77/100
     (1995)      "Strong performances, excellent cinematography and an interesting story make this a winner, even for people who don’t usually watch ‘foreign’ films." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
69/100
     (2000)      "Here we see prison as we’ve seen it before, but with a touch of originality." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
63/100
     (1990)      "The production values give a sense that the movie was quickly and haphazardly put together." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
63/100
     (2002)      "The performances are easy to love while the story is not." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
79/100
     (2003)      "Has an optimistic outlook that uses pessimistic results in a manner fitting for a film of such solid morality." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
79/100
     (2003)      "The film is accompanied by a scant few special DVD features." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
71/100
     (2002)      "With lots of beautiful women, sports action and a chance to live out an arm chair bettor’s fantasy, it will appeal primarily to male audiences." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
62/100
     (1999)      "The film is never able to focus on one storyline long enough to make a meaningful statement before moving on to another and leaving the audience unsatisfied." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
33/100
     (1976)      "This sad excuse for a motion picture should be as quickly forgotten as John Waters’ Mondo Trasho." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
73/100
     (1976)      "The DVD is nothing special." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
73/100
     (1976)      "Since its protagonists are anti-heroic and its antagonists are admirable, it will be hard for audiences to identify with segments of the movie." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
17/100
     (2002)      "Fails to credibly portray a haunted character by imposing its own high-minded opinions without presenting a much-needed counter-point." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
43/100
     (1993)      "A pale husk of a film." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
58/100
     (1998)      "There is a feeling throughout of desire being more important than truth." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
70/100
     (2000)      "While there are fantastic stretches of thought-provoking dialogue, too often, the writers feel it necessary to pander to their audience." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
79/100
     (2000)      "The film has a strong political statement with an impassioned look at the ups and downs of the gay rights movement throughout recent U.S. history." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
29/100
     (2002)      "Delivered in a hackneyed, humdrum way that supplies the audience with minimal action and a plethora of boredom." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
36/100
     (2001)      "Just when it starts to win viewers over as an endearing and romantic film, the twist ending destroys this effect." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
81/100
     (2001)      "Great things come in small packages and this treat of a movie definitely comes in the smallest of cinematic packages." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
70/100
     (2000)      "The rest of the film plays unswervingly like a traditional movie made for television." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
21/100
     (1997)      "It’s hard to imagine anyone finding this movie entertaining." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
84/100
     (1998)      "Deterrence has many bonuses, and the best is its attention to human emotion." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
67/100
     (1999)      "In technique, Diamonds is rather placid." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
61/100
     (1992)      "The cinematography is weak, the framing is off and the performances, at times, are trying." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
61/100
     (1992)      "Has the barest selection of extras." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
42/100
     (2000)      "Dracula 2000 is an update of the classic story that unfortunately drives several nails into the coffin of the vampire genre." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
24/100
     (2000)      "Dragon and the Hawk is a weak attempt at capturing the finesse and charm of Chan’s films – one that never succeeds." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
63/100
     (2000)      "Good action thrillers are difficult to come by and Falling Through is a well-meaning effort that’s held back by significant problems." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
44/100
     (2002)      "A mediocre sketch comedy film with amusing moments, but no substance nor purpose." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
62/100
     (1999)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
83/100
     (2003)      "A fantastically fun film even though it lacks lavish spectacle." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
39/100
     (1967)      "There is nothing either special or fantastic about the DVD." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
39/100
     (1967)      "Viewers should be significantly disappointed in Sonny and Cher’s only film together, as it is certainly not, as the title suggests, good times." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
48/100
     (2002)      "A Blair Witch- style adventure that plays like a bad soap opera, with passable performances from everyone in the cast." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
68/100
     (2002)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
64/100
     (2002)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
45/100
     (2000)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
76/100
     (1974)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
66/100
     (2001)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
46/100
     (1998)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
75/100
     (1999)      "Like 'Empire Records,' if the right audience takes to it, this could become a cult favourite." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
48/100
     (2001)      "The trailer is better made than the film and the deleted scenes could have been left in, allowing more understanding." [dvd review]      Apollo Guide   
  
48/100
     (2001)      "Its premise and execution are reserved for art film students and people who enjoy serial killer flicks." [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
44/100
     (1998)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
  
63/100
     (1998)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Apollo Guide   
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 574  Next

powered by ROTTEN TOMATOES
All articles and reviews on this website © the respective authors.
All other content © The Online Film Critics Society (1.17)