Online Film Critics Society
Home     About OFCS     Member Profiles     Schedule     Forum     Awards     OFCS Blog
    O.F.C.S. Members: Sign In    

Other Info
Sources
• Goatdog's Movies
• Movie-Vault.com
Total Reviews: 962
Michael W. Phillips, Jr.
Michael W. Phillips, Jr.
Michael W. Phillips, Jr.

NEWS & FEATURES
Article type:      Default Sorting (most recent)
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  ( H )  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 52  Next
Sort by
RATING
    
Sort by
TITLE/YEAR
    
Sort by
QUOTE
    
Sort by
SOURCE
  
  
4/5
     (1992)      "Hinges on the leads, who are both equally wonderful." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
5/5
     (1978)      "One of the first and the flat-out best of that ghetto of the horror film genre, the slasher movie." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1935)      "[Leisen] keeps things moving at a nice pace, and his attention to detail in the sets and costumes makes the film a joy to look at." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (1986)      "A showcase of great acting." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
0.5/5
     (2001)      "An excuse for all types of revolting and offensive gore." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1998)      "Some truly hilarious moments, but I spent most of the film with my mouth hanging open in shock." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (2001)      "Starts off really well, progresses at an enjoyable pace, and falters a little about 2/3 of the way through." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1997)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
1.5/5
     (1984)      "It's atrocious, but in an enjoyble way. Except for the music, which is not enjoyable in any way." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1973)      "Entertaining if not incredibly professional." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1990)      "Stanley is nothing if not a master of efficient filmmaking." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (2008)      "Overall, it's an enjoyable sequel, although not up to the admittedly high--heh--standards of the first installment." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4.5/5
     (1971)      "One of the most life-affirming films I have ever seen." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (2002)      "Punishingly long and slow in parts." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (2007)      "Despite its structural flaws, it often delivers the goods." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2/5
     (2001)      "A Xerox copy of the book, and a copy is never as good as the original." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1920)      "Viewers who think "silent" films are boring and primitive would do well to start with this one as an example of how advanced they really were." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (2001)      "One of the strangest and most effective musicals to come along in a long time." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (2001)      "The methodical planning of the caper is completely mesmerizing." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (2004)      "It works basically because of Ron Perlman." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (1969)      "It doesn't escape the overproduction trap, not by a long shot." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (2007)      "A little like a study of the American Civil War that discusses the Confederacy without mentioning the Union." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (2004)      "Each scene is a painting; within those paintings is a ballet of movement, in the guise of wire-aided martial arts." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (1998)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1925)      "A valuable, moving portrait of an immigrant community that tends to be ignored by mainstream films" [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (2005)      "Agreeable if not exactly good." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (2005)      "I wasn't amazed or stunned by this movie, but I felt like it would be nice to hang out with." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (1929)      "It's a sometimes fascinating, sometimes tedious historical artifact." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1987)      "The movie isn't perfect, but it provides some genuine laughs and some real food for thought." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (1999)      "[Keitel and Winslet] don't have much to work with." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (2007)      "It's optimistic, and maybe it doesn't have a heck of a lot to do with history, but it's a tale well told." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1958)      "A delightful horror film, scary enough that the campy aspects of it don't overwhelm you." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (1996)      "Like the Pre-Raphaelite art it evokes, it's pretty to look at, but there's not much there." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
1.5/5
     (2007)      "Even the funny bits are ruined by overemphasis." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1924)      "Has so much momentum and inarguable internal logic that it drags you along, laughing helplessly." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (2004)      "A star-making performance from a guy who should already be a star." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3.5/5
     (1939)      "Plenty of foggy atmosphere." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1968)      "Only partly successful." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (2002)      "So self-conscious of how important it is supposed to be, it never blinks, never smiles, never lets you forget that it is dealing with Deep, Important Issues." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
0.5/5
     (2003)      "A waste of nine bucks and 88 minutes of my life." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2.5/5
     (1945)      "There's no mystery here, no suspense or atmosphere." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (2004)      "It's a gorgeous celebration of movement for movement's sake, color for color's sake, and athleticism for athleticism's sake." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2/5
     (1944)      "This one is just bad." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4.5/5
     (1987)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1934)      "More successful are the domestic scenes between Nathan and his wife Hannah ... which the film needs if he's going to be a likable character instead of just an admirable one." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1997)      "The story seems too intent on spreading quirkiness on with a spatula to be really engaging; you can't picture these people as anything other than movie characters." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
2/5
     (2000)      "Other than some pretty good set design and special effects, there was nothing new of value in this version." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
3/5
     (1943)      "Considerable talent in direction and acting, and if viewers are able to put their cynicism behind them, it is an enjoyable film." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
5/5
     (1998)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
  
4/5
     (1965)      "This film is bonkers ... heady Southern Gothic decadence, histrionics from just about everyone involved, and severed body parts that pop up at the most inopportune times." [movie review]      Goatdog's Movies   
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  ( H )  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 52  Next

powered by ROTTEN TOMATOES
All articles and reviews on this website © the respective authors.
All other content © The Online Film Critics Society (0.22)