Online Film Critics Society
Home     About OFCS     Member Profiles     Schedule     Forum     Awards     OFCS Blog
    O.F.C.S. Members: Sign In    

Other Info
Sources
• Filmcritic.com
Total Reviews: 3895
Christopher Null
Christopher Null
Christopher Null

Article type:      Default Sorting (most recent)
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 3895  Next
Sort by
RATING
    
Sort by
TITLE/YEAR
    
Sort by
QUOTE
    
Sort by
SOURCE
  
  
2.5/5
     (1997)      "When you combine the film's tedious length with questionable casting decisions (Parker disappoints, and Jennifer Aniston plays a surgeon(!?)) you get a fine mess that eventually redeems itself... just not all the way." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (1956)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (1994)      "Genuinely funny" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1979)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2006)      "filled with tiny moments that are instantly amusing, then immediately forgotten when the movie's over." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (2007)      "Ultimately, I was more intrigued by the journey these guys took, but was severely disappointed by how little actually happened on the way." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (1999)      "Unfortunately, much of this potentially good material is paced like a bad sitcom." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2000)      "One hell of an oddity" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (2002)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (1997)      "abruptly ends 82 minutes after beginning, leaving you thoroughly confused. " [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
1/5
     (1996)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (1961)      "good enough to merit repeated viewings. Particularly if you're two." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (2001)      "It's a strange and distant tale that would only appear on Jerry Springer in America but comes off as quirky and cute when presented from the cold Nordic perspective." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2002)      "Unmemorable" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2003)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
5/5
     (1957)      "every bit the classic it's been made out to be for all these years." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (1995)      "Despite my beef with the interminable convolutions of 12 Monkeys, the film has one major thing going for it: put simply, it's very, very cool." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
1.5/5
     (2003)      "uncommonly poor... has nothing at all to say" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (1999)      "I haven't seen a film in the last 20 years that has such bad lighting and poor choice of film stock." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1999)      "The 13th Warrior is simply without thrills and excitement." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2001)      "Slow, plodding, and so far-fetched it stretches the boundaries of 'suspension of disbelief,' 15 Minutes does very little with a good cast." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1997)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4/5
     (1996)      "A solid picture that is probably accessible to a wider audience than Pulp Fiction was..." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4.5/5
     (1998)      "Documentary... mockumentary... it's hard to tell exactly what 20 Dates is, but I know one thing: It's hysterical." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (1954)      "Squid battle aside, though, 20,000 Leagues doesn't give us much more pioneering footage, and that doesn't take place until the very end. The rest of the film -- in retrospect -- is just waiting for the finale." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (1999)      "The cast (playing uber-NYCers) are uniformly grating and obnoxious -- and Courtney Love as ringleader makes it even worse." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
5/5
     (1968)      "It could be the greatest freak-out of all time." [short review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2009)      "Too long by an hour and populated with nothing but stereotypes, we ultimately want the world to come to an end, if only so we can get up and go to the bathroom." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1999)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2005)      "I can't imagine 24 Hours on Google being any more or less compelling." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (2000)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (2007)      "recoups from minor mistakes by making bold choices in the middle and third acts" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
1.5/5
     (2002)      "a morass of stolen plot points" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (2002)      "one quick visit to hell you aren't likely to forget soon" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4/5
     (1977)      "The end result is a film far more reminiscent of Polanski than Altman and stands as one of his most underseen but most compelling works." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2003)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
1.5/5
     (2001)      "Graceland even manages to make bad action films look good." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3.5/5
     (1996)      "a twisted little thriller" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1993)      "Exceedingly long and repetitive." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1988)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2001)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
1.5/5
     (1963)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2/5
     (1998)      "Let it go, Michael. Your subjects are obviously ready to do the same." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4/5
     (1933)      "Of Golden Age musicals, 42nd Street is about as close to the archetype as they come." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4/5
     (2006)      "a return to basics and fine form" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2004)      Click here to see the review! [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
2.5/5
     (1998)      "Extremely watery and soap opera-ish..." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2004)      "Those expecting a raunchy sex comedy from the provocatively titled 6ixtynin9 are in for a severe letdown" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
3/5
     (2000)      "A little phony science I can forgive, but what's less forgivable is that The 6th Day is so damn boring! Where are the thrills?" [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
  
4.5/5
     (1963)      "A seminal work of cinema." [movie review]      Filmcritic.com   
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  Other  
  (1 - 50) of 3895  Next

powered by ROTTEN TOMATOES
All articles and reviews on this website © the respective authors.
All other content © The Online Film Critics Society (0.31)